How Ethereum 0.01 Minimum Eth Testnet Faucet Requirement Created A Big Developer Frustration And Divide

There are several programming languages and several tools to assist in developing applications for various programming languages, such as the compiler, an IDE, and various tools. All these tools come for free but unless you want a premium service you can pay for it, especially for added tools and platforms. This is because for an application to be built it needs a core technology that allows developers to build for free and they can go to the next level of hosting and deploying at a paid cost..

Unfortunately, Ethereum’s developer platform has one big problem with its core technology. Its testnet . To Ethereum’s amazing credit, several of its developments are free. This includes Remix for testing codes, metamask for wallets and, truffle for compilation, several web3.js, ether.js, and the wonderful openzeppelin tools to work with. These are all free and it’s amazing except the blockchain technology has one big extra feature that I guess has been a dilemma for the Ethereum team and those who work around the blockchain, the test faucet.

None of the systems I spoke of, whether a javascript ecosystem or a python ecosystem require you to deploy a set of smart contracts to a network through an API that lets you connect to a node. All these have been provided for free by Ethereum after working with several node-building companies such as Infura and others making it easier for developers to get on board.

However, the test faucet is still an issue for developers who are just coming up. For those full stack developers with several amounts of dollars to spare, this is not a problem, but this piece is for the ordinary developer somewhere in Ghana, Zimbabwe, or in far Malaysia trying to interface with the system, the 0.01 Eth minimum requirement in mainnet’s test faucet system looks like a very badly thought of without regards to its consequences. It looked like a security decision rather than a decision drafted by the real understanding of the world. Ethereum is a global blockchain.The sad case is, that it used not to be so….

Several testnet with supporitng faucets have come and gone. For example, Rinkeby and Ropsten came and were deprecated. Then Goerli came around. The thing is it looks like a faucet itself is a very hard process and left to people with nodes and the ability to build one. This has been the trust the ecosystem has relied on. I am not going to go into how a test is built, I think it can be found on Google somewhere. This article is about the Ethereum ecosystem that has struggled with its testnet, creating more problems in the attempt to resolve it…

Firstly, there used to be a time when the testnet was free. Then there was a lot of pressure causing people to find solutions with sharing with several faucets created. Then a lot of bot activity came through. This created a problem for people managing the faucet so they decided to do anything they could to ensure security, avoid token wastage and the several other stuff that comes with it.

Then Twitter.

After trying to resolve this issue, every developer was supposed to verify via Twitter. This was also not sustainable as this would create a centralized system and I guess Twitter was going to be angry with several calls to its system, so this idea was abandoned.

Then A 0.01 Eth On Mainnet Requirement

With Ethereum’s understanding of reducing bots via making a transaction payable at a cost, it felt the need to set this requirement. This sounded like a good idea security-wise as it prevents bots and ensures serious people only use the test faucet. Except it created a big blockage and I will show you why.

The amount 0.01 eth may sound like a small number but it is a big number for development and for testing development or for setting up. This is in the US about 27 USD. 27 USD in Africa means we are talking about 200–300 ghs for instance for someone from Ghana. This may sound like a low number when calculating things by exchange rates, but measuring by ‘purchasing power’, which is normally neglected, is requesting an American to pay 100 to 200 USD to set up a system. Because 200–300 ghs feels like that in comparison to an American’s ‘purchasing power’. This cuts an entire set of developers because they are not European or American to do a test with that amount.

Depending On Visa Card As A Payment Mechanism For A Decentralized Platform

Most of the tech we build comes from the Western world and from that part of the world, it is deployed to other parts of the world. Unfortunately, most payments are facilitated by VISA and Paypal, which ensures that transactions such as buying or depositing on exchanges, depositing, and general purchasing online are handled effectively.

These companies work very well in Western countries. The banks don’t have a problem. Unfortunately for the rest of the world, this technology sucks. It is a miracle if your visa card goes through after it is issued by an African card in your country. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. The cards from other parts of the world are also flagged down by Stripe as suspicious. I wonder how they get their ‘successful transactions report’ because for 50, 000 successful transactions, 500,000 have been denied. This means this technology cannot be used for a global payment procedure that affects several developers across the world.

Binance understands this problem very well, so it never sets up the Visa Card payment for countries where this is not the main payment system by locals. There is also a reason why the Visa Card has been challenged by several payment companies facilitating payments for other parts of the world.

Unfortunately, although several payment system exists for Ethereum’s Metamask, they seriously do not work. In fact, they are a show.

The Pain Of Depositing Through Metamask

Even if someone wanted to buy this 0.01 eth minimum required amount for his research work or development to work well. For someone in the US, this could be the easiest deal, go to your wallet, input your debit or credit card, and Bingo! For someone in a developing country, it does not work that way, that is because most of the payments in those countries are not debit/credit card. They are just simple payment systems THAT WORK!

A Rule Without Support

Unfortunately, Ethereum after creating this rule did not create the technology for it. This is what they did. They outsourced the payment method.

The method of payment was given to a company called Transakt. Don’t get me wrong, Transakt is a wonderful and great company but it is not a global payment procedure. Even the ones like visas has an issue. There are so many KYC security layers it is ridiculous. We are just trying to get a deposit into a wallet not working through or experimenting with our lives through a cryptographic scheme designed by mankind.

Ever Failing Long Complex KYC Methods

Unfortunately after working through all these complex problems for a young developer, the facial recognition system either does not work, or the process for non-American users fails. This is a global payment system, to be used by the largest amount of Ethereum users. Gosh!

Then it is handed over to Moon Pay. I don’t know if it is a Japanese company but they don’t even support people from other parts of the world. I believe it is a global payment company, but after blasting on visas I think this could be set for people from the Asian region if it is a payment system well acquainted to folks within that specific region. Sometimes the non-American system loads slow taking you through a KYC route to nowhere.

I sighed. I reached out to a friend to get me an amount over using any payment system across his part of the world. He froze. His payment does not even permit the purchase of crypto due to government regulations. This requirement game had turned complex. I reached out to another guy. He was afraid of security reasons for utilizing a credit/debit card especially for something as stereotypically scared of as ‘crypto’.

Complex Node Endpoint Providers

This Ethereum process was turning ridiculous. I subscribed for a Node Endpoint Provider company, I will leave the name for you all to guess. They are good companies with the ability to connect with several blockchain networks.

I tried my bank. My bank was confused. Their debit/credit card worked. At least at their end but it seems it does not work because I soon realized, it is flagged maliciously 15 times by Stripe, a company that does not even exist in my country. (Although the card has only been used once). This was a card being shot down before it was being used. This was not the fault of the card, the card has been issued by an international reputed bank in Africa but the payment processors were failing the card even before the card had been used although unconfirmable, because it is from a certain part of the world.

I reached out to a friend elsewhere. He was able to pay via his debit/card. Awesome, in now. Now I can get all the perks that come along with it. After setting the API up and configuring it, I could detect the endpoint but the authentication had failed. I reached out to the customer support.
All I wanted to do was deploy a contract to a test net. The customer support after helping me out gave up on the situation. They were not a debugger of people’s code and connections

We Are Used To Calling Up Friends To Pay On Our Behalf

There is the sad state that still exists in 2025.It is why for the debit/credit card experience, several people have to call up their friends and it works. This is 2025 and an international processor does not work internationally. This is the payment procedure that the payment on Ethereum relies on. It inherits a traditional global payment failure. The Bitcoin itself is a global payment system and still can’t beat this challenge.

Setting Up Node Endpoint Providers

As I said, I reached out to the customer support of the Node Endpoint since I was not reaching their endpoint. I tried to work around the configuration of their API, it took me the whole night. Ethereum Sepolia was reached but there was no balance. The system reconnected to the node endpoint, and Authentication Failed. Gosh!

The same API I had purchased, just to get around still was not working. I needed a plan …D.

After 3 failed payment attempts just to load something onto the blockchain. I asked if anyone had some eth to send. No! All people had was USDT.

Binance To The Rescue

Finally, I reached up to Binance and signed up. Genius. Fortunately, Binance had not followed Ethereum’s wrong idea. They had a local payment to support my country. After transferring the money and fortunately being able to send ETH from Binance to my address. I was ready to go.

I had met the 0.01 ETH requirement, but …..not yet.

The Creation of Crypto Hijackers

Unfortunately, this system had created a lot of hijacking companies with a lot of test faucets but required you to kiss the ring with ridiculous conditions. Ethereum had become super centralized since it didnt have a common core technology.You had to kiss whatever ring you have since you have no choice. You need to get…

The company’s token to mainnet (Wow!)

Send a thousand RPC request (Unbelievable)

Share our link

Subscribe to our network

And the most ridiculous was,

You do not have transaction history on the mainnet.

The Poor People’s Requirement To Visit Rich Countries Rule Replicated On The Blockchain

Gosh, what new developer has a transaction history to develop on the blockchain? This was ridiculous. The only comparable thing was when people from poor countries were required to have a set ‘minimum amount’ in the bank to come to a rich country and Ethereum had just replicated the same idea.

This was the most centralized system ever invented. Unfortunately as a young developer and writing for most young developers, I could not deploy my system onto the blockchain. The Ethereum payment mechanism inherits a failed payment system in the process of achieving a decentralized free global system.

The Testnet Is An Ethereum Core Technology

The testnet should not be outsourced to anyone since it is a core technology. No one develops a smart contract without testing it and a Remix VM can't replace that. The community can come up with a great plan. Maybe I dont understand how these testnets and faucets work but God help us.

This goes to show that the ecosystem is very built wrongly. A 0.01 eth minimum requirement is a great idea on paper. But if you extend it to the farthest part of the globe. It is not a thought-through idea. Technology must always be built by the have-nots, not the haves. Especially in its design. I am well privileged and could perhaps go through these routes, but boy we are well wrong if we build a technology where you need to be a genius to go around.

I am a writer so I could pen down the process. How many young developers have already given up trying to solve the world’s payment supply chain process, just to develop their app?